BUSE 601 Individual Assignment
Assignment Title: Insightiful Analysis of Emotional Motivation, and Organizational Culture
Total Marks: 30
Introduction
In the dynamic realm of business, understanding the intricacies of emo onal awareness, mo va on, and organiza onal culture is indispensable for effective leadership. This comprehensive assignment is designed to deepen your introspec on and analy cal skills in these three critical areas.
By engaging in a reflec ve and systema c explora on, you will uncover valuable insights into your own emo onal pa erns and mo va onal drivers,
as well as those of your colleagues or subordinates. Addi onally, you’ll undertake a thorough examina on of your organiza on’s culture, assessing
its strengths and areas for improvement.
This assignment not only serves as a pla orm for personal and professional growth but also enhances your ability to contribute posi vely to your
organiza onal environment. You will connect theore cal frameworks to prac cal experiences, enabling a richer understanding of the workplace
dynamics. The insights gained through this assignment are expected to foster a more empathe c, mo vated, and culturally a uned leadership
approach.
1.0 Emo onal Awareness (10 Marks) Word Limit: 750 words
1.1 Personal Emo onal Reflec on (5 Marks)
1.1.1 Iden fy the three most frequent posi ve and three most frequent nega ve emo ons you experience at work, including the triggers for
each.
1.1.2 Reflect on how these emo ons influence your behavior and decision‐making in the workplace.
1.2 Colleague/Subordinate Emo onal Analysis (5 Marks)
1.2.1 Examine a colleague’s or subordinate’s three primary posi ve and nega ve emo ons at work and their poten al triggers.
1.2.2 Discuss the possible impact of these emo ons on their performance and workplace dynamics.
2.0 Mo va on Analysis (10 Marks) Word Limit: 750 words
2.1 Personal Mo va on (5 Marks)
2.1.1 Detail your top three mo vators and demo vators at work, linking them to relevant mo va onal theories.
2.1.2 Explore how these factors influence your engagement, sa sfac on, and produc vity.
2.2 Colleague/Subordinate Mo va on (5 Marks)
2.2.1 Analyze the top three mo va onal and demo va onal factors for a colleague or subordinate, acknowledging individual differences.
2.2.2 Relate these observa ons to mo va onal theories and their poten al effects on performance.
3.0 Organiza onal Culture Analysis (10 Marks) Word Limit: 750 words
3.1 Culture Evalua on Framework (5 Marks)
3.1.1 Conduct a structured analysis of your organiza on’s culture, focusing on observed behaviors, managerial prac ces, and implicit beliefs.
3.1.2 Relate your findings to established models like Cameron & Quinn or the Denison Model.
3.2 Personal Reflec on and Recommenda ons (5 Marks)
3.2.1 Reflect on how the organiza onal culture impacts your work experience. Iden fy cultural aspects that align or conflict with your values.
3.2.2 Provide well‐considered recommenda ons for cultural enhancement, aiming at improving overall employee well‐being and organiza onal
effec veness.
Assignment Rubric
Criteria
1.0 Emo onal Awareness (10
Marks)
1.1 Personal Emo onal
Reflec on (5 Marks)
1.1.1 Iden fica on of Emo ons
1.1.2 Reflec on on Influence
1.2 Colleague/Subordinate
Emo onal Analysis (5 Marks)
1.2.1 Analy cal Accuracy
1.2.2 Impact Discussion
2.0 Mo va on Analysis (10
Marks)
2.1 Personal Mo va on (5
Marks)
4
Excellent
3
Good
2
Sa sfactory
1
Needs Improvement
Precisely iden fies three
posi ve and nega ve
emo ons with clear
triggers, demonstra ng
deep self‐awareness.
Provides insigh ul
reflec on on how these
emo ons impact behavior
and decision‐making.
Accurately iden fies
emo ons with triggers,
showing good self‐
awareness.
Iden fies emo ons and
triggers but with less
precision or depth.
Struggles to iden fy
emo ons or triggers
clearly.
Offers though ul
considera on of the
impact of emo ons on
behavior.
Reflects on the impact,
but with limited depth
or insight.
Provides minimal or
no reflec on on the
impact.
Provides an in‐depth
analysis of emo ons and
triggers, demonstra ng
excep onal
percep veness.
Insigh ully discusses the
impact of these emo ons
on performance and
dynamics.
Conducts a solid analysis
with correct
iden fica on of emo ons
and triggers.
Offers a basic analysis
with some correct
iden fica ons.
Analysis lacks depth,
with inaccurate or
missing
iden fica ons.
Adequately discusses the
impact, showing
understanding and
relevance.
Some discussion of
impact, but lacks depth
or relevance.
Provides li le to no
discussion on the
emo onal impact.
2.1.1 Theore cal Integra on
2.1.2 Impact Analysis
2.2 Colleague/Subordinate
Mo va on (5 Marks)
2.2.1 Comprehensive Evalua on
2.2.2 Prac cal Implica ons
3.0 Organiza onal Culture
Analysis (10 Marks)
3.1 Culture Evalua on
Framework (5 Marks)
3.1.1 Cultural Analysis
3.1.2 Depth and Clarity
3.2 Personal Reflec on and
Recommenda ons (5 Marks)
Excellently connects
mo vators/demo vators
to mo va onal theories
with deep insights.
Deeply analyzes how
these factors influence
engagement, sa sfac on,
and produc vity.
Effec vely links to
theories with relevant
insights.
Some connec on to
theories but lacks depth
in insights.
Minimal or incorrect
linkage to
mo va onal theories.
Provides a good analysis
with clear relevance.
Offers basic analysis,
lacking in depth or
detail.
Fails to analyze or
provide relevant
insights.
Provides a detailed,
nuanced analysis, showing
deep understanding of
mo va onal factors.
Offers insigh ul
implica ons for
performance, showing
high awareness of
dynamics.
Conducts a solid analysis
with some nuanced
understanding.
Analysis is basic,
showing limited
understanding.
Analysis is superficial
or lacks understanding
of the factors.
Adequately relates
factors to performance
implica ons.
Some relevant
implica ons, but
generally superficial.
Fails to offer
meaningful
implica ons or
insights.
Conducts a
comprehensive, insigh ul
analysis using established
models.
Analysis is excep onally
clear, detailed, and
demonstrates deep
understanding.
Provides a solid analysis
with appropriate use of
models.
Offers a basic analysis,
somewhat u lizing the
models.
Analysis is clear and
reasonably detailed.
Analysis shows some
detail but lacks depth.
Lacks a coherent
analysis or does not
effec vely use
models.
Analysis is unclear,
superficial, or lacks
detail.
3.2.1 Reflec ve Insight
3.2.2 Ac onable
Recommenda ons
Provides deep, insigh ul
reflec ons on the impact
of culture; demonstrates
high self‐awareness and
cri cal thinking.
Delivers clear, prac cal,
and well‐jus fied
recommenda ons for
cultural enhancement;
demonstrates strategic
thinking.
Offers though ul
reflec ons with a good
level of self‐awareness.
Reflec ons present but
lack depth; limited self‐
awareness.
Minimal or no
reflec on; lacks self‐
awareness or cri cal
thinking.
Provides prac cal
recommenda ons with
some jus fica on; shows
understanding of
strategic needs.
Recommenda ons are
somewhat prac cal but
lack strong jus fica on.
Recommenda ons are
imprac cal,
unjus fied, or vague.
Assignment Instruc ons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Your submission should be insigh ul, clearly ar culated, and well‐structured.
Include specific, real‐world examples to support your analysis while ensuring confiden ality.
Cite relevant theories and models that underpin your analysis, using APA or Harvard referencing style as per your course guidelines.
Maintain professionalism, par cularly in your observa ons and recommenda ons regarding colleagues or subordinates.
Submit your completed assignment via Blackboard by the specified deadline
A word limit tolerance of ±10% is acceptable. Submissions exceeding this range may be subject to deduc ons.
Ensure originality in your work. Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will result in severe penal es.
Properly reference any sources or materials used in your analysis to avoid plagiarism.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment